Moral Obligation and Legal Duty Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Moral Obligation and Legal Duty - sample ExampleA civilized societys first line of defense is not the law, police and courts but customs, traditions and object lesson values. Behavioral norms, mostly transmitted by example, word of mouth and religious teachings, represent a ashes of wisdom distilled over the ages through experience and trial and error2. Laws are primarily meant to unhazardousguard the clean values of the nation, but this itself raises a number of challenges for the law-making agencies given the examples of a society alter with clipping depending upon the demands of the time. Coleridge said, It would not be correct to say that every moral obligation involves a intelligent trade but every licit duty is founded on a moral obligation. A legal super C law duty is nothing else than the enforcing by law of that which is a moral obligation without legal enforcement3. This root reviews the English medical laws other than the law of clinical negligence with an inte nt to evaluate whether the extent to which the enforcers of these laws ingest a moral obligation to their duties. For this, the issues discussed include miscarriage and euthanasia. If they do so, that would mean that their legal duties are founded on moral obligations. In the last, the recent development of the law of human rights is commented upon from the standpoint of the very issue. Different theories of abortion have emerged over the years. Many people claim that abortion is morally justified since it is a legal procedure. There is a subtle type of argumentation here that basically is saying that if it is legal, it is moral and if it is legal and moral, then it is immoral to oppose it4. A woman who involves herself in sex voluntarily and without the use of contraceptives, she in a way signs a bond with the fetus. A contract entails the demonstrated existence of a pretty (and reasonable) free will. If the fulfillment of the obligations in a contract between individuals could b e life-threatening it is fair and safe to assume that no rational free will was involved5. But a pregnancy happens as a result of rape or forced sex, it is morally feasible to terminate it since the mother never entered the contract willingly, thus rendering it invalid. This in turn justifies all measures taken to terminate the pregnancy out front it reaches the stage when doing so would threaten the life of the mother. Judith Jarvis Thomson considers abortion impermissible but not on the grand that most anti-abortionists base their claims on6 Abortion is not wrong because fetus is a human being and has a right to live, but it is impermissible because a woman carrying her pregnancy to term displays good samaritanism. From a moral standpoint, a woman that carries pregnancy to term generously takes care of the fetus by undergoing pain and repulse while the fetus has the needs but not the rights but a woman, who terminates the pregnancy does not try out this generosity and accordi ngly, does not take care of the needs of the fetus. It is not the case that abortion violates the requirements of morality, therefore, but quite an that continuing to incur the burdens involved in pregnancy goes beyond them7. A womans honourable obligation to the fetus is inevitable irrespective of whether the abortion is legalized or not in a accepted country8. One womans decision to terminate the pregnancy has a number of social implications, which challenges the erudition that it is only