Should the British Media Be Allowed to Publish Private Photos of the Royal Family or Should Their Privacy Be Protected?

Title Should the British media be whollyowed to reveal unavowed photos of the proud family or should their privacy be protected? With the development of science and technology, the media is in addition developing rapidly, from the original newspaper, broadcast, TV to todays Internet, mobile phone, electronic magazines and so on. in that respect is no doubt that is progress, indeed, the media provides a lot of convenience to our feel, for example we neednt go out and know what happened all over the serviceman if each place was hit by disaster, only through the media dissemination for help, friends from all over the world would lend a hand immediately.However, everything has devil sides and the media is no exception. As we know, media is too transp arnt to make our life sentence sometimes no privacy, oddly some world figures life and feelings are always displayd. This judge will examine whether the British media should be allowed to publish one-on-one photos of the pr oud family or should their privacy be protected? Firstly, I think private photos should be protected. Privacy has been defined as the right of individuals to control the arrangement and substance abuse of personal teaching about themselves. (Mason, 1986).And privacy is a cardinal right roll in the hayd in the United Nations Universal Declaration of world Rights. It means that everyone should be equal and their privacy should be protected. Some laws and regulations, which are in the field of personal privacy protection, are also beingness found. For example, there is comprehensive protection for privacy, potential civil and criminal liability, and benevolent rights protection under the European Convention on Human Rights. (Gilbert, 2012). So it is obvious that Western throng will pay more maintenance to the privacy protection.Even avoid asking about their age, income, and marital status. They often use nose into peoples private life, to say people who asked such questionsw ith contempt. Therefore, publishing private photo without individuals permission is an unlawful demeanor. Secondly, the British royal family belongs to public figure, non ordinary person. And the members of the regal Family support The Queen in her many offer and national duties, as well as carrying out important civilize in the areas of public and charitable service, and helping to strengthen national concord and stability. (The role of the proud Family, 2007). That means members of the Royal family are able to recognize and subprogramicipate in community and local events in every part of the UK, from the opening of new buildings to celebrations or acts of commemoration. Therefore, Royal Family plays a positive and courteous role in British society. However, there are some British royal family private photos were published in the public, and those photos have a interdict effect on Royal familys image. Some people suggested that those miens are actually invaded Royal famil ys privacy. only there are some people said that the British royal family is the public figures, and their photos should not belong to infringement. But I have to say that when they got back home to have a meal, sleep and make friends, etc, they also just an ordinary people, who are same as all of peoples life. Therefore, the British media should not publish the photos of the Royal family. Then the other side of this issue would be discussed in the following. That is Royal family were born in an unusual family, destined to their life would be revealed by the media.In other words, our world is fairness, they can enjoy the supreme find they can receive ten thousand people respect and amazement they can enjoy the most luxurious life, etc. However, their private life is facing constantly exposure and revelation. Some of common things just connect with them that will be focused on, and will become the hot result in public to talk about. In fact, some of their private photos should pu blish, because public figures should be actively influenced people and accept the supervision of the people.Some of photos can mull over their personal life, and their positive image can inspire the next generation. In contrast, some negative images or some bad way of life should not publish. Because those pictures would influence the images of the Royal family in peoples mind, especially have a negative effect on children. Therefore, private photos of the Royal family should be allowed to publish. All in all, according to the discussion of this issue from two aspects, I think no one opinion is absolutely right. Although the British Royal family is public figure, they also common persons their privacy should also be protected by the law.Everyone has the right to protect their own privacy and the media should not just for benefits or media value to exposure everything regardless of privacy of people. In contrast, their identity particularity cause that they were born by all the atte ntion. And their behavior always to a large extent affects to young peoples behavior, so the media should expose a part of their privacy to the public so that they set a good image to the public, whilst, it is requires that the public figures also should be attention their behavior particular in the public. ReferenceR. O. Mason (1986), Four ethical issues of the information age, MIS Quarterly, 10 (1) pp. 412. (Accessed 19 October 2012) Gilbert, D (September 14, 2012) After Diana How can knowledgeable royal snaps be published in France? CNN, Online. Available http//www. cnn. co. uk/2012/09/14/world/europe/france-privacy-law-qa/index. html (Accessed 19 October 2012) The official website of The British Monarchy, (2007), the role of the Royal Family. Online. Available http//www. royal. gov. uk/MonarchUK/HowtheMonarchyworks/TheroleoftheRoyalFamily. aspx Online. Available