Truman, Zhdanov, and the Origins of the Cold War

In the West our assumptions about the meaning of the marge democracyhave not really changed since Truman appealed to Congress for financial fear to assist the pop government in Greece in 1945. We do not generally disagree that democracy involves free institutions, representative government, free elections, guaranties of individualist liberty (Ransom Reader, 150), nor that people should be able to live their lives free from coercion ( ibid, 150). To view the Soviet counter-arguments is a revelation, and in m whatever ways a surprise.Zhdanovs argument in his The Two Camp Policy run-in presents an entirely different view of the world, and of world history, and the assumptions in his account were certain(a) to lead to the irresolvable conflicts which constituted the Cold War.Zhdanov argued that westerlyern policy from before the back up World War had always been corrupt and self-serving. The west supported Hitler for a long time because they saw him as capable of inflicting a take in on the Soviet Union (ibid, 158).America only joined the war when the get along was already decided (ibid, 159), thus saving herself casualties and significant loss. The coupled States, he implies, was driven only by self-interest, and no genuine desire to see freedom prevail in the world.The united States Policy after the war was dominated by the need of the Wall Street bosses (ibid, 159) to rebuild profits, and thus to establish new markets. Foreign policy was therefore expansionist and right (ibid, 159) in order to maintain imperialist influence to ensure markets for capitalistic enterprises.Trumans claim that the defence of the government in Greece was a honourable matter, a humanitarian concern to protect National integrity against obstreperous movements that seek to impose upon them totalitarian regimes (ibid, 150) was therefore bogus and dishonest.This meant a aim to combat socialism and democracy and to support reactionary and antidemocratic profascist regim es and movements everywhere (ibid, 160). The united States, Zhdanov claimed, was seeking to dominate the world for the sake of capitalist profit, and not for any genuine love of freedom.All true, but perhaps merge quotes a infinitesimal bit, and in your own words interpret what stage he is arduous to get at. Why is this such a big deal for Zhdanov? What point is he trying to make about the US and their post-WWII plans? Thus Zhadanovs notion of democracy begins to emerge.The western model he dismissed as bourgeois pseudodemocracy (ibid, 161). It is an error, he argued, that democracy is characterized by a plurality of parties and an make opposition (ibid, 161).This belief involves a misunderstanding of history and of the nature of socialism. Capitalists and landlords, antipathetical classes, and hence a plurality of parties, have long ceased to exist in the U. S. S. R. (ibid, 161), and this is an inevitable development in a socialist state. The people argon the state, he argu ed, and therefore the class conflicts which lead in western countries to differences of interests, plainly will(did) not occur.The United States cynical claim to defend freedom was in fact a defence of the bloody dictatorship of the fascist nonage (ibid, 161) over the people of Gerece and Turkey. America itself was marked by national and racial oppression, the corruption and the unceremonious abrogation of democratic rights2 (ibid, 161), and the policy of the United States was to take a leak a bloc of states which would be blackmailed into supporting the United States line through with(predicate) the use of economic power, and thus give up their own independency and freedom.What about the other aspect to Zhdanovs definition of democracy? peculiarly in how he differentiates himself (and USSR) from what is wrong about the United States (what makes them un-democratci).According to Zhdanov, The west, and particularly capitalist America, was the enemy of all anti-imperialist and demo cratic (ibid, 160) nations. Trumans arguments had at least the realness of moderation. No government is perfect (ibid, 149), he ack nowledged, and certainly the newly democratic Greek government was not perfect.Zhdanovs argument for the one-party scheme sounds either hopelessly idealistic, or utterly dishonest. The catastrophic purges of the 1930s and by and by make the claims about freedom very questionable, and suggest, according to Thomson, that the nemesis of big parties is self destruction, and the price of absolute power absolute corruption (Thomson, 721).Stalin was opinionated to remove all opposition, and concentrated on destroying those who had held rank in the communist party during the 20s and 30s, men like Zinoviev, Kamenev, Radek, Sokolnikov and Tukhashevsky.Thousand were arrested, in all walks of life, and many went to their deaths, or to long Siberian imprisonment. This hardly supports Zhdanovs claim that opposition would only not exist. If you use this quote, you need to explain it a little further.What atomic number 18 the purges, and how do they negate Zhdanovs notion of democracy? The Stalinist line, set forth here by Zhdanov, drove the world into forty years of monstrous confrontation, before the ultimate collapse of the system and its ideology.A corresponding paranoia in the west led to aggressive stand-offs in Europe, where large numbers of NATO troops were stationed in Germany in the Middle einsteinium, where The Arab-Israeli conflict often took the form of war by proxy between east and west and in South East Asia, where the Korean War and later the Vietnam War were caused partly by the United States neurosis about communism. The arming of the Mujahedin in Afghanistan in the mid-eighties was one of the last policy errors of the Cold War, and one of which we be now suffering some of the unforeseen results.How did the United States contribute to this conflict? Where are some areas in the world where we see this conflict occur ring, between the United States notion of democaracy and the Soviet Unions? plant CitedThomson, David. Europe Since Napoleon. Harmondsworth Penguin, Revised Edition, 1966.Truman, Harry S. , The Truman Doctrine Twentieth Century Civilizations. Ohio Thomson fashion Publishing, 2003. (3) 149-153.Zhdanov, Andrei A. , Cultural Purge Twentieth Century Civilizations. Ohio Thomson Custom Publishing, 2003. (3) 159-163.